Ryzen 1700 cinebench 1080p#
Ryzen 1700 cinebench update#

Again, this game appears to be optimised for Intel processors and it’s likely that an update will bring better performance for AMD’s chips.

Ryzen 1700 cinebench 1080p#

However, at 1080p with low detail settings, the 7700K and 6900K pull out big leads. Again, the picture was similar, with the higher-detail, higher-resolution scenario resulting in consistently GPU-limited performance across all the test CPUs.

Instead, the game seemed to prefer the extra cores of Intel’s eight-core processor.įinally, we come to Ashes of the Singularity, a game that has hundreds of units on screen at once, making for a stern test for CPUs. Although it’s interesting to note that the much faster clock speed of the 7700K over the 6900K was of little benefit. Again, a good portion of this is the game being poorly optimised for the AMD processors, but clearly there remains an advantage with higher clock speed. But the Ryzen 7 1700’s clock speed is slow enough that it shows a noticeable drop in performance, even at these settings.Īt 1080p and medium detail settings the Intel chips really pull away. Hopefully, this will be addressed with an update.įor the 1800X there’s no difference at 1440p with Ultra detail settings, since its speed still results in the GPU being the bottleneck. First, that this game is just generally better-optimised to run on Intel processors, as demonstrated by the 6900K being faster than the 1800X. However, as we switch to a more CPU-intensive title such as Battlefield 1, we see two things. At 1080p with detail set to Medium and at 1440p with detail set to Ultra, all our test CPUs are limited by graphics card speed so provide identical performance. Starting with the least challenging test for CPU usage, The Witcher 3 is the most representative game of our tests when it comes to modern, graphically rich FPS/RPG titles. In terms of gaming, it’s here we really see the advantage of the extra clock speed of the 7700K and also that single-threaded speed isn’t necessarily an advantage. If you have £330 to spend on a CPU, the 7700K is far better for single-threaded applications and the 1700 for multi-threaded tasks. Overall, the picture really is as clear as the two processor’s specs would suggests. The results were far closer in this test, but it’s a relatively short and simple transcode operation so doesn’t fully tax the CPU for long. The faster-clocked 1800X took just 70 seconds. Moving on to a real-world example, using the Handbrake video-conversion tool to change a 1080p video to 720p, the 1700 managed this in just 81 seconds, while the 7700K took 95 seconds. Similarly, in POV-Ray, the 7700K established a 50% lead in the single-threaded test but then dropped all the way back to trail the 1700 by 35% in the multi-threaded test. Starting with Cinebench R15, in this benchmark’s single-threaded test the Rywas 44% slower than the 7700K in the multi-threaded test it was 42% faster. 2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz RAM.That is, it was super-impressive in multi-threaded workloads but struggled in single-threaded ones. In our tests, the Ryperformed exactly as we expected.